IE11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Lucas Ropek

Lucas Ropek is a staff writer for Government Technology. He has worked as a newspaper reporter and writer in Massachusetts and New York.

“We've used it for COVID; we also used it throughout the George Floyd protests,” said Los Angeles' Chief Innovation Officer Amanda Daflos. “It was a really important tool for understanding what people were feeling and thinking about. ”
A hacking group that has successfully attacked at least three universities recently has threatened to publish sensitive research information to the dark web if monetary demands are not met.
The Southern California municipality initially told residents that their personal information had not been compromised in the March incident, but hackers' decision to publish the city's data online shows otherwise.
The bill, introduced in February, has the potential to create additional protections for sensitive state data, but there are still policy areas that might need fine tuning before the proposal goes further.
The new CDO has been with the San Francisco city and county government for the better part of a decade and has been in charge of data operations since his predecessor stepped down over a year ago.
The Alpha project, a three-month sprint to transform the state’s website into an iterative, responsive platform, is getting assistance from data analytics and other types of user research.
The proposed act, from the group behind the California Consumer Privacy Act, would ensure companies follow the standards of that earlier legislation.
For the most part, the 2019 state legislative session didn’t bring the changes to the California Consumer Privacy Act that businesses had sought.
The Neighborhood Data for Social Change initiative teams USC with regional law enforcement agencies to share a select number of crime data sets with the public — things like police incidents of force, citizen complaints, rates of arrest and police officer turnover rates.
The legislation would bar police from utilizing facial recognition software or other biometric surveillance technology in their body cameras.
With less than six months until the California Consumer Privacy Act takes effect Jan. 1, 2020, lawmakers are still considering legislation that would expand and modify the landmark law — if passed.
After hearing from representatives of law enforcement and civil liberties groups, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to put a moratorium on the municipal use of facial recognition technology. Their city is the first in the country to do so.
A bevy of bills would create additional consumer protections, but key parts of the legislation have shifted or fallen away since originally introduced. They include restrictions on what data voice assistants can store.
The new form of online disinformation has some government officials uneasy about its potential effects on upcoming political campaigns and elections, but policy efforts to address it are sparse.
The Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association opposes the measure, which firefighter associations back because of safety concerns.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has postponed a decision on the Stop Secret Surveillance ordinance until later this month. If approved, the proposal would, in part, ban the consolidated city-county from using facial recognition software.
The LA Found Initiative, launched in October by Los Angeles County, deploys radio tracking to watch over at-risk adults.
The partnership will focus on a number of initiatives, including collaboration involving some 3,200 recently installed smart streetlights, which are equipped with a bevy of sensors that assist with data collection and law enforcement operations.